User 4549
Roy, That really is nit picking. "Of course someone at the relevant authority also got it wrong. They got it wrong once though, not for 10 years". Why didnt somebody in authority check the TRO when they first applied and began operating it in 1997, and they didnt realise until 2007 and it was the Judge who spotted it.
Oh dear User4549 - you forgot to change your user name Roy, I only have one user name and thats the truth, perhaps you will explain
Julian you really ought to try and keep you temper.
"druguser4549,Are you two working as a team thats what Roy used to call me, unfortunately its not true as it would affect my pacemaker. haha So where and when do you want to meet Birdman
A pretty expensive one, but you have no criticism for the authorities for getting it so badly wrong and for 10 years. Once again it was a Judge who ruled.
What about the authorities morality?
You commented -they are getting quite confrontational aren't they?- you have called me 'maggot brain, cretin and senile, the worst I have called you is an idiot, so who is being confrontational? Just say where and when and you can say it to my face.
Here you are Roy: And it was 24,899 so called offenders, and before you get all hot and heavy, I admit that most if not all may have been speeding which I will agree is wrong, but they operated this site for ten years without the correct TRO, which is not legal, a silly but costly mistake, as I have said many times before, we should be able to trust these highly paid people to get it right first ...
PJD, It does not need one as you are right, good to see common sense can prevail. Amazing that these people (DSCP) still use the word OFFENCE and yet they have to reimburse 24,899 people since 1997/2007. Yet no offence was committed The Dorset Safety Camera Partnership (DSCP) can confirm that it has secured agreement regarding dealing with speeding offences detected by the safety camera ...
ooops putt FELL699 mmmyyyy mmiissttakkee
