Judith Chalmers
Roberta, it would have been simpler but also pointless. If the outcome had been "No", then that would mean that most of those surveyed would have wanted no change to the current carbuncle. And that evidently isn't what they want.
Chris, tut-tut, you're not allowed an opinion unless you're a member of the Swift family. Get with the programme...
I always really enjoy this feature in the paper, mainly because I look forward to seeing how wrong John Southall's positional sense is when he takes his photos. Todays edition is yet another case in point, bless him.
Thanks Lynne. :-)
Maggie, how many of those objections are merely pro formas filled in by the uninformed (or more likely, misinformed) elderly rank and file of this town? I did ponder over the placement of a couple of the apostrophes, and I'm still not sure whether it's right or not. However I bow to your evident superior knowledge of such important matters. ...
You'll be the first to know. Oh no, I hope that doesn't start a raft of comments...
Well said Bob!
I'll be on the beach at 6.30pm on Saturday. I wonder if there'll be many people setting sail in their homemade watercraft? Then on Sunday at 4.30pm I'll be taking advantage of my insider knowledge and will be pulling some strings. TRAINERS ONLY! At 6.30pm on Monday is my French language class. This week the lesson is going to be about Jeux Sans Frontieres. I'm going to be in ...
The Dawlish Gazette should hang it's head in shame over it's sensationalist coverage of this story, and likewise it's ridiculously biased coverage against the attempt to secure £1m funding to improve our town. It begs the question, what is their agenda????
Thanks. I really appreciate your positive feedback. And here's me thinking that I was the only one to realise that. Cue at least 4 Agrees...
