So the glorified dog walking area has had the go ahead. Not convenient for the residents of DA2 or those that could have walked from Dawlish! With the field closest to the new development for over 1000 + houses not included, this makes it difficult for access, since walking along Shutterton Lane is frankly dangerous from either end and there is no path to St Mary's Cottages, even if one intended ...
There is less chance of a play park being vandalised if it can be seen from multiple houses, see the below: http://www.playengland.org.uk/media/70684/design-for-play.pdf 4. Choose a location with informal oversight The degree to which the play area needs to be overlooked will depend on the individual site but in general play provision is best placed close to other facilities where there ...
If they are going to put the play park on the lawn, maybe they should put it where the bowling green is and then create a new bowling green where the play park is in the manor grounds! Lovely setting and at least the players would get peace and quiet. As for parking and toilet facilities it is not much further than where they are now.
Sorry been working away. The document in relation to Hill Drive contains information sent to the Inspector in relation to the Hill Drive case, it covers the DA2 Framework Document. The Planning Officer states this: 'Our Executive has now resolved to Adopt the SPD. This decision is subject to a 7 day call in period by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee after which time the Framework will ...
The Consultation did not contain the road changes as these were added after. If I read the below correctly, the public could challenge the document and force a second public consultation that includes the road changes. Sorry it is so long, but it contains points that need to considered. CONSULTATION AND LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS Clive Sheldon QC 19. Although in general there is no ...
It depends if the Elm Grove Road area create a protest group to challenge this, others have used the below to delay or reverse documents, therefore there is redress if it is not acceptable to the public. I don't know but I think you can use legal aid for things like this: The final SPD, incorporating any modifications proposed as a result of consultation, was adopted at full council on ...
It looks like if people are affected by a Supplementary Planning Document they can do the following: The final SPD, incorporating any modifications proposed as a result of consultation, was adopted at full council on Tuesday 1st April 2014. Any person aggrieved by the decision to adopt the SCI/SPDs can apply to the High Court for permission to apply for a judicial review of that ...
Maybe they could put affordable houses there, so the children will not have to go far to get to school! Or a new school building and have a split site? Handy since DCC have ignored the call for another school near Sainsburys. This means the remaining schools, all on bad roads will have more children and traffic put upon them, causing safety issues. Will be interesting what they do use it for ...
I heard Ros Prowse was expecting her comments to reach the Dawlish Gazette and she was right. Here is the Gazette's take on it. The comment that worries me is this: However, a suggestion for the developers to jointly procure the road was ruled out as the landowners were ‘unwilling’ to co-operate. So if they are unwilling to work together, what makes any of us sure that they are not ...
I heard Ros Prowse was expecting her comments to reach the Dawlish Gazette and she was right. Here is the Gazette's take on it. The comment that worries me is this: However, a suggestion for the developers to jointly procure the road was ruled out as the landowners were ‘unwilling’ to co-operate. So if they are unwilling to work together, what makes any of us sure that they are not ...