SoulofDawlish
Looks like you've hit a nerve there, OF. My own view is publish - and be damned. It would appear from the postings above that others are of a similar disposition.
For the benefit of those 1000-plus people who have signed the paper petition and who have been following events on this discussion thread, this email was received yesterday by 38 degrees signatories: Dear Friends, Thank you for signing the petition 'Immoral tactics of Teignbridge District Council'. We will be handing this petition in to the the offices of the Department of Local ...
Richard Weeks (and Martin Wrigley, Cockwood Residents Association chairman) did a piece for ITV yesterday at Warren Farm. TDC were unable to attend, however it is understood they may be interviewed on camera today. Most likely TV appearance is following the late evening news but it may be worth keeping an eye on earlier local news slots also.
BTW, you should stick to travel documentaries, Judith. Someone who does not know their ass from their equine cousins should not be preaching on countryside matters.
As a matter of fact, yes. Unless my compass has let me down (that's my actual compass, not the moral variety which appears to have gone astray at Teignbridge HQ), it would appear both sites have mobile homes on them.
Thank you Howard. Just out of interest, one of the least expensive options for a 'Dawlish Avoiding Line' would run through Dawlish Warren, bisecting the new housing area DA2 and going around the back of the town over Dawlish Water. Reason enough to keep the pressure on maintaining and improving the existing line?
@Mcjrpc : Thanks for your comments. There are many factors that have led to the decision by Teignbridge to plump for Warren Farm for a 'coastal park' and for SANGS provision. I will not list them all here as most have been covered adequately (or through the various links) however one of the most important elements, delivery - and the social cost of the displacement of Richard Weeks and his ...
The land I believe you are refering to is that covered by PP 10/02648/MAJ which, you will note, is similarly conditioned.
So Howard are you saying that the Council Officers have been badly advised?
@Judith Chalmers : I know little about the land owners other than what is already public knowledge. On this matter also, you would seem to have me at an advantage. The granting of conditional planning permission for the planning application 08/02952/MAJ is quite clear in what is not permitted - and what is . I have read it carefully - I suggest you (and anyone else with concerns on ...
