Andrew
@webmaster see my last post at 21:30 and your last post at 21:27. Hypothetically how would a post by someone else appear at let's say 21:28 that hadn't been there before 21:30? how is that possible?
@webmaster you told @TheObserver 'i think you are wrong to denigrate gary for posting on here' at 15:52. Seemed like an objection to me. Objection: a reason for disagreeing with or opposing something : a reason for objecting
@webmaster , you can't object to people on dawlish.com having a low opinion of politicians, whether those politicians had an account on dawlish.com or not. Theresa May obviously doesn't give a damn about people struggling to make ends meet. I'll treat her with the contempt she treats others. Le Pen is a racist therefore if we are to treat her as she treats others then we'd do so in a ...
@webmaster - Past tense you mean - Gary Taylor closed his account before the comments made by @TheObserver , therefore he was no longer a member. So @TheObserver 's comments were about a former member, a politician like any other. unless you're telling us that @Gary Taylor is still a member and he hasn't closed his account.
@webmaster i wasn't suggesting any high ranking politician is likely to post on this site. you've misunderstood me. but yes i agree in that unlikely scenario traffic would be huge. I meant if you intervene to object to people having a strong view against someone like Cllr Gary Talyor, then why not intervene against strong views and denigration of other politicians and where does it end the ...
@webmaster . I agree but if people do not treat you that way then they should be held to account. Cause and effect.
@webmaster i don't think @Gary Taylor was bullied off either. you wrote that some people had been though. I mean if someone said 'Putin is a tyrant or Russian mafia' would that be permitted? I was just surprised to see a moderator offering their personal view that's all. @webmaster if trump or le pen were posting on this site i wouldn't be as enthused - they're the far-right ...
@Lynne , go ahead take your turn.
There's nothing to stop the Lib Dems posting on Dawlish.com. I don't think Gary Taylor's contribution particularly did anything to rebuild the Lib Dem's reputation post-coalition. Nor did his postings convince me that the Lib Dems aren't predominantly concerned with 'winning here' and gaining power. @webmaster plenty of politicians have been denigrated on this forum. from trump and le ...
The Lib Dems don't exactly have a lot to tell the town. There's not much difference between Taylor and Wrigley, the latter has just enough sense not to embarrass himself daily on Dawlish.com. Taylor is either not bothered about being re-elected or completely naive, whereas Wrigley doesn't risk being rejected or jeopardizing his public persona.
