Brenda
If the Tories won under PR I'd respect it as the outcome of a legitimate and democratic process. But I wouldn't like it Just because I'm anti Tory, it does not make me pro-Labour. Are some of you that ignorant? And the SNP would've won a majority in Scotland regardless of which electoral system was used. The near future might clearly indicate that most Scottish people do not want to ...
They are only energy efficient in use. In extraction, manufacture, transport and in disposal and landfill they are energy inefficiant. They're not eco as the 'energy efficient' materials like celotex and kingspan are basically poystyrene, blown at very high temperatures, transported half way round the world and therefore use lots of energy in manufacturing and transportation and also after ...
Yes it is happening already. PR has to happen, no other meaningful change can occur without it. I'd join a local PR group, campaign only on that issue with a broad base. We need real activism, not just online discussions.
Election Turnout = 66.1% Do so few believe in democracy? Or is it really a democracy, so should we bother? Tories gain 51% majority with 38% of the vote. In principle that's not fair no matter who wins, Tory or Labour. Or anyone else. My point isn't simplistically about those 2 parties, The two party system is defunct. I despise Labour and the Lib Dems as well as the Tories, But The ...
@Paul , you seem to have missed the point about proportional representation completely. Do you even know what it means? 1st past the post = Conservatives with 51 % majority nationally Whereas PR - a fairer reflection = Conservatives with 37% nationally and therefore no majority. And that figure falls when you consider representation of the 33.9 % non voters. Some would like ...
Putting words in your mouth in a written, online exchange?? Hardly. Bizarre. Check your inbox, then you might understand why we've fallen out. Some people are worth falling out with, such as dodgy local politicians. This is just a waste of both our time. Good night
Maybe the near future is just war, doom and gloom, climatic chaos, resource depletion. But some people need a positive vision. People voted Green based on hope and morals and an understanding of the biggest threats to the whole planet, not just our society, people voted Tory based on fear, money and security and a naive belief that benefits trickles down. We disagree, that's okay, but ...
I think as you do A Frame, but if you grew up with the fear of nuclear war and anti-cold war propaganda then you can see why many voted for the party of Churchill. Being a cynic, I wonder if it was a hoax, perhaps Dave Cameron set it up with his media buddies while he was holidaying nearby.
Who have I called names? I have referred to nicknmaes, there is a difference. I do have a choice, I can protest. I do not think 1st past the post is legitimate, as do many others. The first rolke of government is to protect, correct. But as I mentioned above some threats we create ourselves. By that i refer to the environment. I see a need for armed forces, of course I do, but war is ...
I agree with you on points 1 and 3, the Green idealism does sort of depend upon world peace. But the complete opposite to core green policy, which is to allow further environmentally reckless policies under the Tories is not the answer.
