Dawlish News
The main problem with the Torygraph article quoted by “Burneside” is that it’s a lie. JC was not “heavily involved with London’s Labour Briefing”, and therefore the rest of the text copied from that article is fake news.
Yet again, the right wingers trot out the boring old line/lie about JC supporting the IRA. It’s simply not true - and that’s a fact not an opinion
The precedent was set locally when Richard Weekes was granted permission to build a house in the middle of his supposedly precious farmland. This Leo Michaels chap however seems to be a nasty piece of work. I’m not sure though that planning decisions can be based on a persons character.
I’m touchy about your feeble trolling/stalking. You need to get over it burneside. Thanks for your contribution though.
Says Diana Mond. Who rattled your cage burneside? Or are you just trolling?
Sticks and stones, but there’s still no such thing as the Dawlish News newspaper. When one is moaning about accuracy, it’s always good to get ones facts correct.
Dawlish News? There’s no such newspaper.
What information do you mean and how do you want it presented? As far as I can work out, the only meaningful way to present it would be to list every single response. And I’m personally not sure how that amount of detailed data would help anyone. However, I’m definitely coming round to the notion that the consultation should have included a “No I don’t want a playpark anywhere on the Lawn”. ...
I would imagine that it’s because not all of the 680 residents answered all three questions.
I do wonder why people regard “Health & Safety” as an evil?
