General Discussion
The reference to "too much money" is about how much poorer the EU will be when one of its largest net contributors is no longer paying into the coffers, but instead of cutting its cloth to suit its new means Juncker just plans to make the remaining members pay more. How very EU.
Let's see if the council will allow a private group take over a public facility.
You mean a few hundred people out of 13,000, who responded to a consulation, want a play park.
Isn't it already illegal to pay women a lower rate for doing the same job as a man?
And yet the government has allowed hundreds of terrorists to return to the UK and disappear back into the community. More terrorists incidents waiting to happen. It beggars belief. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/isis-british-jihadis-return-uk-iraq-syria-report-islamic-state-fighters-europe-threat-debate-terror-a8017811.html
I don't have a problem with that. Although if the BBC went subscription-only I rather doubt there would be much of a BBC left to watch. Given the choice, I wouldn't pay for the BBC in its current form, let alone what it would be like if people had the freedom not to pay for it.
There shouldn't be a TV licence, if people want to view the BBC's output then they choose to pay for it, just like people choose to pay to watch Sky's channels.
That's a good idea, now let's apply that principle to the BBC's funding.
So passports will cost less than they did nine years ago, why are you getting your knickers in twist?
What you believe to be true might be enough evidence for you, it isn't for me, you'll have to do better than that.
